Sign up for our e-newsletters:
Support our mission:
Comments [1]
This is a great reminder clip taken from the longer Feldenkrais lesson commonly called Chopping Wood or Praying Mantis. Take the 13 minutes and let us or Charlie know how it works out for you. Enjoy.
submitted by Cynthia Allen
Comments [0]
Comments [0]
It’s true; it is well supported in medical and scientific literature that, in and of themselves, flat feet do not require some kind of treatment. Yet it I suspect it is also true that if you find an adult with flat feet, you will also find an adult that has been given an extra supportive shoe or an orthotic for those flat feet.
A recent New York Times article about orthotics and flat feet recounted the experience of Jason Stillman, a man with flat feet that virtually every medical doctor he has ever seen has tried to treat. Starting in puberty, Stillman was given orthotics to wear all the time. (1)
According to the Mayo Clinic, an individual has flat feet when the arches on the insides of the feet are flattened, allowing the entire soles to touch the floor when standing up. (2) In searching for definitions, this seems to be a fairly common one.
If you have read the first two installments in this series, you probably know by now that I am fairly enamored with Dr. Hoffman’s study of hundreds of pairs of feet in which he compared shoe wearers to life-long barefooters. (3) In 1905, Dr. Hoffman called into question some of same issues that have been all over the news for the past few years.
In his findings, Hoffman concluded that while low arches (a decreased longitudinal arch) is less common than a medium arch (follow link to see the bones of the foot and a medium arch), it has no bearing on the common diagnosis of “flat foot”. Stillman, the man who started wearing orthotics in puberty might agree since he has now weaned himself almost entirely from orthotics and uses them only when running.
“Observations on the longitudinal arch of the foot led to the conclusion, contrary to common opinion and teaching, that its height and shape are of little or no value in estimating the usefulness of the foot, and that there is no one type as the normal, but that normal feet present high, medium and low arches. While it is true that the moderately high arch is in preponderance, the very low arch, when present, seems to be no indication of weakness, and in many instances where it was found in the primitive Filipino or African, it was associated with a foot that was strong and flexible.”
He goes on to say that the so called flat foot diagnosis is not dependent on a low arch but “whether there was a transition from an original higher condition with concomitant change in the relationship of the tarsal bones and strain of ligaments and muscles.” He felt such a transition was rare.
“It is not uncommon to find the same symptoms associated with arches of good height and I have found them associated with an extraordinarily high arch. It is equally as common to find low arches in symptomless feet.”
Arched, flat and flexible - What?!
As you can see in the illustration based on Dr. Hoffman's research, an adult Bagobo, who had never worn shoes, did have flat feet.
Dr. Benno Nigg, a professor of biomechanics and co-director of the Human Performance Lab at the University of Calgary in Alberta, has always wondered what the big deal about flat feet is. He views foot arches as an evolutionary remnant for gripping trees. However, study of the hominin foot from the Plio-Pleistocence period suggests that even then there was a great deal of variation in arch development. "Lucy" in particular had flat feet. (4) Research just published last month by Carol Ward and colleagues confirms that Lucy and her kin had a stiff mid-foot that allowed for extensive walking but was not as good as the flexible mid-foot apes use for branch grabbing. (5)
Today's human foot is an interesting combination of stiffness and flexibility. The stiffness gives us a lever for pushing against the ground, the flexibility provides the shock absorption.
Propulsion and Shock Abortion
Developments in artificial limbs has highlighted the importance of ligaments and tendons as springs for motion against gravity. Springs have the interesting quality of storing energy and delivering explosive power. Prosthetic limb researcher Hugh Herr has done some leading-edge exploration along these lines using his own body as the laboratory. Herr lost his legs below the knee at age 17. Since then he has systematically worked to bring himself back to normal function. At MIT, he has honed in on the important role of tendons and their spring-like fibers. "The body uses springs to reduce the work the muscles have to do. The human leg is filled with them, and there is this elaborate energetic flow. Energy is constantly being shuffled from tendon to tendon to tendon." (2)
Herr has been using motors to feed energy into springs so that the spring can release pent-up energy at once, allowing the prosthetic foot to propel off the ground like a normal human foot. Herr is himself now running up to four miles a day using his own technology.
Of course, all these spring-like tendons work together. They are continually sending information up the spinal cord to the brain, and the brain is sending instructions back down. All along the chain, an intricate coordinated response is being formulated moment to moment.
How does this relate to flat feet? As Dr. Nigg in 2011 indicates, and as Dr. Hoffman wrote in 1905, flat feet are not necessarily a problem.
An Integral Human Gait™ View
From our Integral Human Gait™ theory perspective, the "flat foot" is a bit misleading. A low arch does not inhibit the springs on the tendons of the lower extremity from working efficiently. I have seen a number of clients with high arches whose tendons have lost their spring.
From a somatic perspective, the image we have of our body matters. If you would like to improve your walk, try thinking of your feet and lower legs as containing springs. Simply shifting your idea can make a huge difference. For the therapist or somatic educator working with a person who has lost the spring in the longitudinal arch of the foot, try playing with dynamic alignment (not static) and engage the client in press/release motions along the entire chain, or at least the chain of the foot to the gluteal muscles. Include in your thoughts and plans for improvement not only the muscles and tendons but the bony arch of the foot through the tibia, fibula, and even how the head of the femur seats itself in the hip socket, noting its response to pressure or availability of response to a downward force.
Supporting a flat foot with a hard arch support is likely to have the effect of further solidifying the image that the arch is rigid and instead of flexible and responsive.
There is a classic Feldenkrais® Awareness Through Movement® lesson that can be used to awaken the flexible arch of the foot. We have made an abbreviated version available MP3 audio available at no charge: Mapping The Arch of the Foot. It is one of the key exercises we use in our Gait for Wild Human Potential workshop. Take a listen. You will likely be surprised at by the lesson.
_______________
Cynthia Allen is a Feldenkrais® Practitioner and Bones for Life® Teacher/Trainer. She is co-creator of the Integral Human Gait™ Theory and teacher of Gait for Wild Human Potential workshops.
______________
References
(1) Kolata, G. (2011, January 18). Close Look at Orthotics Raises a Welter of Doubts, The New York Times, p. D5.
(2) Mayo Clinic Staff (2010). Flatfeet. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/flatfeet/DS00449 accessed 2/06/11
(3) Hoffman, P. (1905). Conclusions drawn from a comparative study of the feet of barefooted and shoe-wearing peoples, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2 (3), 105-136.
(4) DeSilva, J. M., & Throckmorton, Z. J. (2010). Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins, PLoS ONE 5 (12). Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0014432
(5) University of Missouri-Columbia (2011, February 10). Foot bone suggests Lucy’s kin had arched foot, for walking. ScienceDaily. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2011/02/110210141213.htm
(6) Piore, A. (2010, November) The Bionic Man, Discover,31(9), 52-57
Comments [0]
Comments [0]
|
Download Abstract [PDF] Graphs related to key tests and sketches of Feldenkrais Functional Integration® lessons are also available for viewing in post: Case Study Results: Judy |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE It is our belief that the primacy of gait has been vastly overlooked both in identifying its vital components as well as understanding its effect on human health. We have developed a theory called Integral Human Gait(tm). Integral Human Gait (IHG) probes unexplored lines of thought in the kinetic analysis of gait including ground reaction forces (GRF) in various positions, the uncoiling/spring power of counter rotation throughout a closed system, and the value of using sensory experiences. In this case study, IHG theory was used to guide the assessment and intervention with a client who had underlying musculoskeletal dysfunctions from long-standing scoliosis and more recently, a full thickness rotator cuff tear, both of which contributed to significant functional limitations.
METHODS Judy referred herself to Improving the Gait, a 3-day workshop, due to an increasing undesirable feeling of “dragging my body around” and an increasing need for rest. The workshop was on Integral Human Gait(tm) using a didactic and experiential format that included Awareness Through Movement® lessons, Bones for Life® processes, and physical therapy exercises. IHG explores ground reaction forces using the vertical power line of the heel and its impact on spinal alignment and counter rotation at various points from foot to head. Post workshop Judy received five Functional Integration® (FI) lessons. Tests administered included Timed Up Go (TUG), One Legged Standing Test with Eyes Closed (OLST) and several tests selected from the Berg Balance Scale. Tests were not specifically selected for this case study but used because directly prior to the workshop, Judy volunteered as a participant in an inter/intra reliability pilot. Videotape of Judy’s gait was also recorded. |
RESULTS Improvements were measured at 3 days and sustained at 1 week in the following tests: Timed 360° both directions (360x2); Timed Alternate Placement of Foot on Step (STEP); Timed Tandem Stance (TS); and Timed Standing on the Left Foot (FOOT). No significant changes were measured in TUG, OLST or Right FOOT. Improvements in standing rotation were demonstrated. Her gait displayed subtle but increasing levels of counter rotation between pelvis/lower extremities; pelvis-lower ribs/shoulder girdle; and head/shoulder girdle. Counter rotation of the arms was increasingly generated by trunk rotation instead of movement at the glenohumeral and elbow joints in the sagittal plane. Judy’s need to rest “on a regular basis” decreased from 2-3 hours to no more than ½ hr daily. She reported depression over the decline of her physical body lifting. “I know it is possible to move securely even if I get up in the morning and feel out of alignment. I know the path I can use for moving forward confidently.” Judy further reported standing longer in choir performances without having her “back go out.” Results related to her shoulder have been variable.
DISCUSSION With the intervention Judy learned how to recognize and transmit GRF from the vertical power line of the heel to the head. We theorize that the transmitted GRF served both as feedback and feedforward input into the nervous system allowing decompression of the scoliotic spine. The decompression restored the biomechanical possibility for counter rotation, both locally between the vertebrae, and globally with the head, shoulder and pelvic girdles. Both decompression and counter rotation are needed to perform well in 360x2, TS, STEP and FOOT. The lack of improvement in TUG and OLST seems appropriate. The components of rising from a chair quickly, fast walking, and peripheral proprioceptive balance input were not specifically addressed in the Gait Workshop. Using gait as an instrument to assess change and design interventions, Judy experienced improvement in stamina, emotional outlook and back comfort with standing and walking. She is currently continuing with FI lessons and open to surgical intervention if needed. While the Feldenkrais® community understands gait from a broader perspective as compared to a traditional model, IHG theory creates a template for discovery of previously unexplored aspects of gait, thus enabling the practitioner and client to experience more focused outcomes. Additionally, people with scoliosis have more difficulty and energy expenditure in moving than is commonly understood. It is a novel idea to consider that a person’s scoliosis could contribute to a rotator cuff tear; and how, if left unaddressed, it may lead to a change in function. Innovative and less observed in the health care community, is the examination of “how” a person walks, and the impact that this “how” has on one’s overall health and sense of well being.
Comments [1]